From Checklists to Judgment

When we first discover fundamental investing, we all crave the same thing: Certainty.

We look for a formula. A magic set of rules that, if followed rigorously, will guarantee a safe path to compound returns. We devour books by Greenblatt, Lynch, and Graham. We build excel spreadsheets that look like NASA control panels. We create The Checklist:

If the stock passes the test, we buy. If it fails, we ignore. It feels rigorous. It feels scientific. It feels safe.

But if you have been in the market for more than a few years, you know the painful truth: The checklist is not enough.

Some of the biggest mistakes in our portfolios were companies that passed every single quantitative metric on our checklist. They looked like perfect "Compounders" on paper, right up until the moment their business model evaporated. Conversely, some of the biggest winners of the last decade (think heavy-CAPEX compounders or high-P/E luxury monopolies) would have failed a rigid value checklist.

Today, I want to talk about the most difficult transition in an investor's life: the shift from Quantitative Compliance (Checklists) to Qualitative Wisdom (Judgment).

This is the evolution from being a technician who reads the price tag, to a business owner who understands the value.

While winter brings lots of good cheer, it can also mean new risks: icy roads, unexpected storms, and increased holiday travel. That makes now the perfect time to ensure that you and your family are fully protected. Your home, your vehicles, and your peace of mind all deserve coverage that fits your current life—not outdated premiums from years past.

EverQuote lets you compare personalized quotes for bundled home and auto policies, multi-car coverage, and more—all in one simple dashboard. Whether you're prepping for long drives to see family or keeping your home secure through the colder months, our tools help ensure your protection stays strong and your money works smarter.

See your savings today!

Let’s be clear: Checklists are essential. In aviation, medicine, and investing, they prevent stupidity.

At YAIN, we love a good framework. Checklists are the "Guardrails." They protect us from our own behavioral biases. They stop us from buying a highly leveraged airline just because we liked the in-flight meal. They filter out the garbage—the unprofitable, the indebted, the eroding.

In the early stages of our journey (the Competent stage), the checklist is our master. It provides a binary output: Pass or Fail. It treats investing as a Science.

The problem arises when we confuse the map for the territory.

A checklist can tell you what a company did yesterday. It can show you the historical ROIC (Return on Invested Capital). It can show you the past five years of margin expansion. But financial statements are, by definition, backward-looking. They are the rear-view mirror.

The rear-view mirror is perfectly clear. The windshield, however, is often foggy.

Consider a classic "Value Trap" scenario—let’s say, a legacy satellite TV provider or a combustion-engine auto parts maker.

On a checklist, this stock looks like a screaming buy. It scores 10/10 on a quantitative value screen. But Judgment asks the questions that Excel cannot answer:

The checklist measures the magnitude of the moat. Judgment measures the direction of the moat.

As we evolve from Competent to Proficient (and hopefully, one day, Expert), we stop asking "Does this meet the criteria?" and start asking "What is really going on here?"

This is where investing becomes an Art.

Judgment is the ability to synthesize soft, fuzzy, non-quantifiable inputs into a conviction. It is the ability to handle nuance. Here are the three pillars where Judgment must override the Checklist.

The Checklist View:

The Judgment View: Checklists love "Insider Ownership." But not all ownership is created equal. A founder who owns 20% of the company but has checked out mentally to play golf is far more dangerous than a hired CEO who owns 0.1% but is obsessed with the customer experience.

Judgment requires us to read the earnings call transcripts, not just for the numbers, but for the tone.

One of my favorite "Judgment" tests is the Time Horizon Test. When an analyst asks about next quarter's margins, does the CEO pivot to talking about the product roadmap for 2030? That is a qualitative signal that no Bloomberg terminal can capture.

The Checklist View:

The Judgment View: Culture is the operating system of the company. It is what happens when the manager isn't in the room.

Take Costco — $COST ( ▲ 1.05% ) . On paper, it’s a low-margin retailer. A strict "High Margin" checklist might filter it out. But Costco’s culture—paying employees more than competitors, capping markups at 14%, obsessively refunding customers—is the strongest moat in retail. It creates an "Economy of Shared Scale" that is mathematically impossible to replicate.

Or look at Constellation Software — $CSU.TSX ( ▼ 1.5% ). The decentralized culture of trust, where small business unit managers are empowered to deploy capital without headquarters' approval, is the secret sauce. You can’t model "Trust" in a DCF. You have to feel it by studying the company’s history and behavior during crises.

Developing judgment means becoming a corporate anthropologist. You look at Glassdoor reviews (with a grain of salt), you test the product, you talk to customers. You try to understand if the company has a "Soul" or if it is just a machine. Machines eventually break; Souls can adapt.

The Checklist View:

The Judgment View: This is the hardest hurdle for value investors. We are wired to buy $1 for 50 cents. But in the modern economy, intangible assets (brand, network effects, switching costs) do not depreciate like factories.

A checklist would have rejected Hermès or Ferrari — $RACE ( ▲ 4.26% ) every single year for the last decade. They always looked "expensive" at 40x earnings. Judgment understands that Duration matters more than Multiple.

Paying 40x earnings for a company that can compound at 15% for 20 years is actually cheaper than paying 10x earnings for a company that will grow at 2% for 5 years and then die.

Judgment allows you to say: "The optical valuation is high, but the durability of the growth is underestimated by the market." This is the "Quality Anomaly." The market is good at pricing next year's earnings (Risk), but bad at pricing the sustainability of earnings ten years out (Uncertainty).

So, how do you move from the checklist to judgment? You cannot buy it. You have to earn it. But there are ways to accelerate the process.

Charlie Munger’s favorite mental model: "Invert, always invert." If your checklist says "Buy," force yourself to write the "Short Case."

Checklists confirm what we want to see (Confirmation Bias). Inversion forces us to use judgment to defend against the unseen.

A checklist forces a binary decision: Pass or Fail. Judgment introduces a third, powerful bucket: "Too Hard."

You might look at a bank. It’s cheap, profitable, pays a dividend. It passes the checklist. But then you look at its derivatives book and realize you don’t understand the counterparty risk. The Checklist says: Buy. Judgment says: I don't understand the tail risk. Pass.

Knowing what you don't know is the highest form of investor intelligence. As we evolve, our "Too Hard" pile should actually grow larger, not smaller. We become pickier. We realize that we only need a few great ideas in a lifetime.

Checklists look at ROIC (Past). Judgment looks at ROIIC (Future). Where can the company deploy the next dollar?

The checklist sees the same 20% ROIC number for both periods. Judgment understands that the compounding engine has slowed down because the reinvestment runway is gone. This is the difference between a "Compounder" and a "Cash Cow." Both are fine, but they require different valuations.

Does this mean we throw away the checklist? Absolutely not.

Investing without a checklist is gambling. It leads to "Story Investing," where we get seduced by charismatic CEOs and total addressable markets (TAMs) that don't exist.

The goal is to be a Centaur: Half Machine, Half Human.

When you start, let the checklist drive the car. It keeps you on the road. But as you gain experience, let the checklist become the passenger. It navigates, it warns you of speed limits, but you—with your judgment, your intuition, and your understanding of business quality—are the one holding the steering wheel.

The evolution of an investor is not about finding more complex formulas. It is about learning to trust your eyes when the formula says one thing, and reality says another.

Stay disciplined, but stay curious.

Take one stock in your portfolio that "looks expensive" (High P/E) or "looks ugly" (temporary headwinds). Put the checklist away. Write down in 3 sentences: "Why will this company be more relevant in 2035 than it is today?" If you can't answer that without looking at a spreadsheet, you rely on the checklist. If you can, you are using Judgment.