Mastering the Market - Part I

Why YAINers Should Ignore the FOMO Frenzy

In partnership with

Before starting we have a small announcement to make: next week we will publish our monthly deep dive on Evolution Gaming Group — $EVO ( ▼ 4.56% ) on Monday, the second part of this article; then on Monday the 4th of August our July monthly summary. After that, also considering that we expect most of you to be on vacation, we will pause the newsletter until the beginning of September.

“Big Plastic” Hates Them

From water bottles to shrink wrap, Timeplast has a $1.3T market opportunity with its patented plastic that dissolves in water. But the clock is ticking to invest. You have until midnight, July 31 to become a Timeplast shareholder as they expand globally.

This is a paid advertisement for Timeplast’s Regulation CF Offering. Please read the offering circular at invest.timeplast.com.

The Siren Song of Soaring Markets

In the contemporary financial landscape, characterized by instant information dissemination and ubiquitous connectivity, the investment world often appears as a rapidly accelerating current. News of soaring market indexes and the swift accumulation of wealth by "others" is a constant presence, amplified relentlessly by social media platforms and 24/7 financial news cycles. This environment creates a powerful psychological gravitational pull, making it profoundly challenging for investors to maintain an objective and detached perspective.

At its core, financial Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) is defined as the "anxiety that one misses out on profitable financial opportunities others benefit from". A good example, is this post we found on X:

After reading it, one may be tempted to think: my portfolio did not make that much, I need to change my entire strategy as I’m not getting as rich as I should! This thinking is fundamentally driven by a deep-seated "desire to jump into potentially lucrative investments or spend impulsively to keep up with others". This is not merely a transient feeling but rather "a state of mental or emotional tension resulting from the fear of missing something," frequently manifesting as a form of social anxiety.

For YAINers, observing broad market indexes—often propelled by a concentrated few high-flying "growth" stocks—surge ahead can be deeply unsettling. The sensation of "falling behind" or "missing out" on seemingly effortless gains can erode conviction and tempt even the most steadfast to deviate from their proven strategies. This discomfort, while pervasive, is a critical psychological trap. The continuous observation of others' financial successes, particularly when highlighted by public figures or peers, normalizes and even glorifies impulsive, trend-chasing behavior. This process fosters a collective irrationality, where individuals are drawn to assets "simply because they see others doing the same without conducting due diligence or evaluating the asset's real potential". This dynamic suggests that FOMO is not an isolated personal failing but a societal phenomenon, intensified by modern communication channels, which makes it increasingly difficult for individuals to maintain an independent investment philosophy. The discomfort experienced by value investors is a symptom of this social contagion, rather than an indication of a flawed strategy.

This article will demonstrate that this pervasive discomfort is a classic psychological trap. For YAINers, resisting FOMO is not merely an exercise in emotional control; it is an adherence to a time-tested philosophy that, while sometimes appearing out of sync with short-term market enthusiasms, consistently delivers superior results over the long haul. We will explore the behavioral underpinnings of FOMO, the enduring principles of value investing, the cyclical nature of market performance, and practical strategies to cultivate unwavering discipline.

The Anatomy of Financial FOMO

Financial FOMO represents an intense anxiety stemming from the perception that others are profiting from lucrative financial opportunities that one is not participating in. This emotional state frequently translates into an impulsive desire to enter trending investments, often without due consideration for underlying fundamentals or personal financial objectives. Historically, this phenomenon has been a significant driver of market excesses, from the 17th-century Tulip Mania to the Dot-Com bubble of the early 2000s.

Psychological Drivers

The roots of financial FOMO are deeply embedded in human psychology, manifesting through several interconnected behavioral biases:

  • Herd Behavior: Humans possess a natural inclination to follow the actions of the crowd, particularly in situations marked by uncertainty, such as investment decisions. This "safety in numbers" mentality can lead investors to base their decisions on the collective buying and selling preferences of the masses, rather than on independent, rational analysis. The widespread presence of FOMO can thus contribute to the formation of speculative bubbles in the market, as individuals, fearing exclusion from perceived opportunities, drive prices higher without sufficient fundamental justification.

  • Confirmation Bias: This cognitive bias intensifies FOMO by leading individuals to selectively seek out and interpret information that confirms their existing beliefs or desires, while simultaneously disregarding contradictory data. When an investor is drawn to a trending asset, they tend to focus exclusively on news and information that highlights the asset's potential gains, ignoring any warnings or signs of risk. This creates an "illusion of certainty" around inherently risky investments, pushing individuals to take unnecessary chances based on an incomplete understanding.

  • Social Comparison: A fundamental human tendency involves assessing one's own success by comparing it to that of peers, particularly those within similar social or economic circles. When friends, family members, or colleagues boast about significant investment returns, it can trigger a potent mix of envy and insecurity. This emotional response generates a sense of urgency, compelling individuals to make investment decisions in an attempt to "catch up" or avoid "falling behind" their peers. This innate desire to maintain a comparable status with others strongly fuels the FOMO impulse.

  • Loss Aversion & Regret-Avoidance Bias: Individuals experience the psychological pain of losses far more intensely than the pleasure derived from equivalent gains. In the context of FOMO, the fear of missing out on a lucrative opportunity can feel psychologically equivalent to an actual financial loss, prompting impulsive actions to avoid future regret.  This bias also manifests as a reluctance to sell investments that are losing value (to avoid realizing a loss) but a hasty tendency to sell winning investments prematurely. Decisions are frequently made with the primary aim of minimizing potential future regrets, even if this means imitating others without conducting rational analysis.

  • The Dopamine Rush: From a neurological perspective, the anticipation of a potential financial windfall or the observation of others' success activates the brain's reward system, leading to the release of dopamine. This surge of dopamine creates a feeling of excitement and pleasure, reinforcing the desire to take action and encouraging individuals to invest in trending assets for the sheer thrill of potential gain, often overriding rational thought processes.

These psychological drivers are not isolated phenomena; they form a powerful, self-reinforcing loop that significantly amplifies FOMO. For instance, herd behavior is often initiated by social comparison and the desire to avoid the regret of missing out. Once an individual begins to lean towards a trending investment due to these social pressures, confirmation bias activates, causing them to actively seek and prioritize information that validates their impulsive decision while ignoring contradictory evidence. Concurrently, the neurological dopamine rush associated with the anticipation of gains provides a physiological reward, further reinforcing the irrational behavior. This interconnectedness means that effectively combating FOMO necessitates a holistic approach, rather than attempting to address individual biases in isolation. Investors must understand that these biases operate in concert to hijack rational decision-making, making a multi-faceted strategy for discipline absolutely essential.

Furthermore, FOMO often thrives on narratives of unprecedented change and unique opportunities that supposedly defy historical patterns. The Dot-Com bubble, for example, clearly illustrates a pattern where investors "overlooked traditional metrics" and disregarded "sound business plans". This behavior points to the "illusion of control" bias, where individuals mistakenly believe they have greater control over uncertain situations than they actually do, leading them to perceive situations as less risky. This is frequently coupled with a "this time is different" narrative—the belief that new technologies, such as the internet then or artificial intelligence and cryptocurrencies today, somehow invalidate historical financial principles and valuation fundamentals. The "growth over profits" mentality and the "aura of 'new economy' invincibility" prevalent during the dot-com era explicitly demonstrate this departure from rational analysis. The recurring nature of bubbles, regardless of the "new" asset class involved, serves as a powerful reminder that fundamental economic principles and valuation discipline remain timeless. True innovation does not exempt investments from the laws of economics.

Beyond the obvious financial losses incurred during the bursting of speculative bubbles, there is a significant psychological cost. FOMO itself is described as "a state of mental or emotional tension" and "a form of social anxiety". The bursting of bubbles can lead to profound "economic and psychological and behavioral distress". The constant pressure of social comparison and the pervasive fear of regret create chronic stress and anxiety, even for those merely observing others' perceived gains. This implies that avoiding FOMO is not solely about protecting capital; it is equally about safeguarding mental well-being and emotional stability. These non-financial costs can be substantial and can impair an investor's ability to make rational, consistent decisions over the long term. A disciplined approach to investing contributes to a more peaceful and confident financial journey.

Historical Case Studies of FOMO-Driven Bubbles

The destructive power of FOMO is not a new phenomenon; it has manifested repeatedly throughout financial history, often with devastating consequences.

  • Tulip Mania (17th Century): Considered the first documented financial bubble, the Dutch Republic in the 1630s witnessed an unprecedented speculative fervor over tulip bulbs. Driven by the fear of missing out on rapid wealth accumulation, prices for tulip bulbs soared to irrational highs, with some rare varieties trading for more than houses. People acquired bulbs not for their aesthetic value or planting, but solely with the intention of reselling them at a higher price. Even the middle class and poorer families took out loans or mortgaged their homes to participate.  The illusion shattered in February 1637 when an auction failed to attract buyers, triggering a collapse in confidence. Within days, prices plummeted by over 90%, leading to widespread financial ruin for many novice investors.

  • The Dot-Com Bubble (Late 1990s - Early 2000s): The late 20th century saw a similar speculative frenzy, this time centered on the burgeoning internet and technology sector. Between 1995 and its peak in March 2000, the NASDAQ Composite index, heavily weighted towards technology stocks, surged by an astonishing 400-500%. Valuations reached unsustainable levels, with the Nasdaq's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio spiking to 200, dwarfing historical norms.6 Investors largely disregarded traditional financial metrics and sound business fundamentals, pouring capital into internet startups, many of which had no profits, material revenue, or even finished products. The prevailing sentiment was one of "growth over profits" and an "aura of 'new economy' invincibility". The bubble burst in March 2000, leading to a brutal correction. The Nasdaq index tumbled nearly 77-80% from its peak by October 2002, and it took a staggering 15 years for the index to regain its pre-bubble highs. Thousands of dot-com companies went bankrupt, starkly illustrating the dangers of speculation divorced from fundamentals.

  • Recent Examples: Modern markets continue to exhibit FOMO-driven behaviors. The cryptocurrency boom of 2021-2022, particularly the surge in assets like Dogecoin with celebrity backing, served as a prominent example of widespread FOMO in finance. Similarly, the phenomenon of "meme stocks" has seen shares of certain companies surge based on internet popularity and social sentiment rather than traditional valuations. Even the current market's concentration in a few "Magnificent Seven" stocks, while often backed by strong fundamentals, can reflect a "FOMO money" dynamic, where investors funnel capital into perceived winners, potentially overlooking underlying valuations or diversification.

To further illustrate the psychological journey of investors through these market cycles, a conceptual diagram of the Investor Emotional Cycle is highly valuable. This diagram typically depicts a circular path of emotions, beginning with optimism, progressing through excitement, thrill, and euphoria at market peaks, then descending into anxiety, denial, fear, desperation, panic, capitulation, and depression at market troughs, before gradually rising through hope and relief back to optimism. This visual representation vividly portrays the psychological traps FOMO exploits, particularly at market peaks. It helps investors recognize and anticipate their own emotional states and the collective sentiment of the market, thereby empowering them to avoid making irrational decisions driven by euphoria or panic. By understanding the full emotional cycle, investors can comprehend that emotional extremes are temporary and often signal crucial turning points.