- Yet Another Investing Newsletter
- Posts
- Sin Stocks
In partnership with
Pecunia non olet
Sin stocks, shares in companies involved in industries like alcohol, tobacco, gambling, sex-related businesses, and weapons manufacturing, have long sparked fervent debate among investors. While many consciously avoid these sectors for ethical or Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reasons, others are drawn by their historical reputation for strong, remarkably resilient returns. This article delves into the historical performance of sin stocks, their unique behavior across economic cycles, and critically examines whether they truly merit a place in a diversified investment portfolio.
HR is lonely. It doesn’t have to be.
The best HR advice comes from people who’ve been in the trenches.
That’s what this newsletter delivers.
I Hate it Here is your insider’s guide to surviving and thriving in HR, from someone who’s been there. It’s not about theory or buzzwords — it’s about practical, real-world advice for navigating everything from tricky managers to messy policies.
Every newsletter is written by Hebba Youssef — a Chief People Officer who’s seen it all and is here to share what actually works (and what doesn’t). We’re talking real talk, real strategies, and real support — all with a side of humor to keep you sane.
Because HR shouldn’t feel like a thankless job. And you shouldn’t feel alone in it.
What Are Sin Stocks?
Sin stocks refer to companies operating in sectors often considered morally or socially controversial, including:
Alcohol: Businesses involved in the production, brewing, distilling, and distribution of alcoholic beverages. Key players range from global giants to craft producers.
Tobacco: Companies that manufacture and distribute cigarettes, cigars, chewing tobacco, and, increasingly, next-generation nicotine products like e-cigarettes and heated tobacco.
Gambling: Enterprises running casinos, online betting platforms, sportsbooks, and lottery operations. This sector's public perception and legality vary significantly by region.
Sex-related industries: Sex-related industries: This diverse category encompasses companies in adult entertainment, manufacturers of sexual health products, and various services within the adult market. Due to stigma, many companies in this space remain privately held, and the publicly traded subset tends to be small-cap and often not included in broader sin stock indices or funds like VICEX, which further limits their investability.
Weapons manufacturers: Defense contractors producing military hardware (aircraft, missiles, naval vessels), as well as companies manufacturing firearms and ammunition for civilian use.
Historical Performance: Sin Stocks vs. the Market
Multiple studies have consistently found that sin stocks outperform the broader market over long periods. Here's an expanded look at the evidence:
Global Outperformance (1996-2019): A global portfolio of sin stocks (alcohol, tobacco, gambling, and defense) demonstrated an annualized geometric return of 11.2% from 1996 to 2019. This significantly outpaced the MSCI World Index (excluding sin stocks), which returned 6.9% over the same period. The sin stock portfolio also exhibited a higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs. 0.51), indicating superior risk-adjusted returns, meaning they delivered more return for each unit of risk taken. This robust finding suggests that the outperformance isn't merely due to higher risk, but a genuine premium.
U.S. Market Dominance of Tobacco (Decades-Long): In the United States, tobacco stocks have historically been among the most remarkable long-term outperformers across various industries. Data extending back several decades into the latter half of the 20th century consistently shows tobacco companies delivering exceptional returns, often surpassing broad market indices like the S&P 500. This was fueled by the addictive nature of their products leading to inelastic demand, strong pricing power, and high barriers to entry that limited competition.
Academic Confirmation (Early 2000s onwards): Landmark academic research by Hong and Kacperczyk (2009) was pivotal in documenting this "shunned-stock premium" in U.S. markets. They hypothesized that the outperformance was driven by a "neglect effect" – fewer institutional investors and analysts covering these stocks due to ethical considerations, leading to potential undervaluation and higher subsequent returns. Subsequent studies by other academics, including Blitz and Fabozzi (2017) and more recent works extending through 2023-2024, have continued to explore and, in many cases, affirm this outperformance, even when accounting for traditional risk factors like size, value, profitability, and investment strategies using models like the Fama-French Five-Factor model. While the magnitude of the premium might be debated across different models and timeframes, the existence of abnormal returns for sin stocks is frequently observed.
European Markets: Research analyzing European sin stocks (alcohol, tobacco, gambling, weapons) through periods extending to 2024 also indicates the presence of historically significant abnormal returns. This suggests the phenomenon is not exclusive to the U.S. market but has broader international applicability, although local social norms and regulations can influence the specifics of the premium.
Fund Performance as a Real-World Indicator: The Vice Fund (VICEX)
While academic studies construct theoretical portfolios, the performance of real-world funds like The Vice Fund (VICEX) provides practical evidence. This fund explicitly invests in tobacco, alcohol, gambling, and defense companies.
Outperformance in Specific Years: VICEX has demonstrated its ability to outperform the S&P 500 in various years. For example, in 2012, VICEX delivered a strong 21.2% return, notably higher than the S&P 500's 16% for that year. More recently, in 2015, VICEX returned 2.58% while the S&P 500 managed only 1.38%. Crucially, during the market downturn of 2022, VICEX posted a positive return of 3.26%, dramatically outperforming the S&P 500's significant decline of -18.11%. This highlights their defensive nature, particularly in adverse market conditions.
Long-Term Context: While VICEX has shown specific years of outperformance against the S&P 500, it's also important to note that its overall annualized return since inception (August 30, 2002) up to recent periods (e.g., 7.45% as of March 31, 2025) has, at times, lagged its primary benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Total Return Index (which returned 9.11% over the same period). This indicates that while "sin stocks" as a category might show an anomaly, individual funds' performance can vary based on specific holdings, management fees, and the exact years analyzed within the broader market context (e.g., the heavily tech-driven S&P 500 bull market post-2020).
These examples, both from academic research constructing broad sin stock portfolios and the performance of dedicated funds like VICEX, collectively illustrate the historical tendency of sin stocks to outperform the broader market over long horizons, often with defensive characteristics during downturns. However, recent market dynamics, particularly the concentrated growth of large-cap tech, have introduced periods where their relative performance can fluctuate.
Sector cheat sheet
Alcohol
Key Players: Constellation Brands, Anheuser-Busch InBev, Diageo — $DEO ( ▼ 0.73% ) , Pernod Ricard.
Performance: Alcohol stocks have delivered strong, steady returns, often outperforming the market, especially in the UK.
Resilience: Demand for alcohol is relatively inelastic, supporting stable revenues even during downturns.
Tobacco
Key Players: Altria — $MO ( ▼ 0.27% ) , Philip Morris International — $PM ( ▲ 0.09% ) , British American Tobacco — $BTI ( ▲ 1.29% ) , Japan Tobacco.
Performance: Tobacco stocks have historically been among the best-performing equities in the U.S., with high margins and consistent dividends.
Resilience: Tobacco is considered recession-proof due to addictive demand.
Gambling
Key Players: MGM Resorts — $MGM ( ▼ 2.0% ) , Boyd Gaming — $BYD ( ▼ 2.27% ) , Wynn Resorts — $WYNN ( ▼ 1.75% ) , Las Vegas Sands — $LVS ( ▼ 0.38% ) .
Performance: Gambling stocks can be volatile. While they often recover quickly after downturns, they underperformed during the Great Recession.
Resilience: Gambling demand can be cyclical, but low-cost entertainment options remain appealing during recessions.
Sex-Related Industries
Key Players: Veru Inc. (sexual health) — $VERU ( ▼ 0.41% ) , Playboy Enterprises (entertainment), RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (adult clubs) — $RICK ( ▼ 1.09% ) .
Performance: Data is less robust, but companies in this sector often benefit from steady demand and niche markets.
Resilience: Products and services often see stable demand, but regulatory and reputational risks are high.
Weapons Manufacturers
Key Players: Lockheed Martin — $LMT ( ▲ 0.65% ) , Northrop Grumman — $NOC ( ▲ 1.73% ) , Raytheon — $RTN ( ▼ 4.47% ) and $RTX ( ▼ 0.46% ) .
Performance: Defense contractors have delivered strong, steady returns, benefiting from government contracts that are less sensitive to economic cycles.
Resilience: Weapons manufacturers are largely insulated from consumer spending cycles, as their revenues depend on government budgets.
Sin Stocks During Boom Times and Recessions
Performance in Recessions
Recession-Proof: Sin stocks are often labeled as “recession-proof” due to the inelastic demand for their products—people continue to smoke, drink, and gamble even in tough times.
Empirical Evidence: Studies show that sin stocks and portfolios like VICEX outperformed the S&P 500 during the 1991, 2001, and 2007–08 recessions. For example, during the 2007–08 crisis, a sin stock portfolio had a beta of 0.35, meaning it fell much less than the broader market.
Gambling Exception: The gambling sector can be more sensitive to economic downturns, with notable underperformance during the Great Recession.
Performance in Boom Times
Relative Underperformance: Some evidence suggests sin stocks may underperform during strong bull markets, as investors seek higher-growth sectors like technology.
Steady Returns: Even in booms, sin stocks provide consistent, if less spectacular, returns due to stable cash flows and dividends.
Why Do Sin Stocks Outperform?
The consistent outperformance of sin stocks can be attributed to a confluence of factors:
Neglect Effect (or Reputational Risk Premium): A significant portion of institutional investors, pension funds, and retail investors adhering to ESG principles actively screen out sin stocks. This reduced demand from a large segment of the market can lead to these stocks being undervalued, trading at a discount compared to their fundamentals. Investors willing to overlook the social stigma are thus compensated with a "reputation risk premium," leading to higher expected returns.
High Margins and Barriers to Entry: Many sin industries boast exceptionally high profit margins. Furthermore, they often benefit from strong brand loyalty (e.g., specific alcohol or tobacco brands) and significant regulatory barriers that make it difficult for new competitors to enter the market. This limits competition and allows established players to maintain pricing power.
Inelastic Demand: As discussed, products like alcohol and tobacco face consistent demand regardless of economic conditions, providing a stable and predictable revenue stream.
Consistent Cash Flow and Dividends: Many mature sin companies are cash cows, generating substantial free cash flow. This often translates into generous dividend payouts and consistent share buyback programs, appealing to income-focused investors and enhancing total returns. For example, Altria (MO) and Philip Morris International (PM) are renowned for their long histories of dividend increases.
Defensive Qualities: The combination of inelastic demand and steady cash flows makes these stocks inherently defensive assets, providing a buffer during economic downturns and geopolitical uncertainties.
Risk Premium: Investors demand higher returns to compensate for litigation and reputational risk.
Despite their compelling financial performance, investing in sin stocks comes with notable criticisms and risks:
Ethical Concerns: For many investors, the primary deterrent is ethical. Investing in companies that profit from addiction, violence, or potentially exploitative industries can conflict with personal values and institutional mandates for social responsibility. This can lead to public backlash and divestment campaigns.
Regulatory Risk: Sin industries operate under constant threat of increased regulation and taxation. Governments frequently impose higher "sin taxes" (e.g., on tobacco or alcohol) or enact stricter advertising and sales restrictions (e.g., plain packaging laws for cigarettes, bans on certain gambling products). These measures can significantly erode profitability and future growth prospects. The U.S. FDA's aggressive stance on nicotine products, for instance, represents a significant regulatory headwind for tobacco companies.
Litigation Risk: Industries like tobacco and gambling have historically faced, and continue to face, substantial litigation from individuals, states, and consumer groups seeking damages related to health issues or problem gambling. These legal battles can result in massive financial penalties and reputational damage.
Shifting Social Norms: Public opinion and social norms around these industries can shift rapidly. What was once tolerated may become stigmatized, leading to reduced consumer base, talent recruitment challenges, and greater regulatory pressure.
Volatility in Certain Sectors: While generally defensive, some sin sectors, particularly gambling and parts of the sex-related industry, can be quite cyclical and volatile, making them susceptible to broad economic shocks.
Should You Own Sin Stocks?
The decision to include sin stocks in a portfolio is a deeply personal one, requiring a balance between financial objectives and ethical considerations. Sin stocks have a long history of outperforming the broader market, particularly during economic downturns. Their resilience comes from inelastic demand, high profit margins, and regulatory barriers that limit competition. While ethical, regulatory, and reputational risks are significant, the financial case for sin stocks remains compelling. They may be especially attractive to investors seeking income, consistent cash flow, and portfolio stability in uncertain macroeconomic environments. However, values-driven investors should carefully consider whether these advantages align with their personal principles. As with any investment decision, choices should be guided by individual goals, beliefs, and risk tolerance.