The Merit of Investing in Small-Cap Stocks

In partnership with

Investing in small-cap stocks presents a unique proposition within the equity market. While large-cap stocks such as Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon dominate headlines, it's the lesser-known small-cap names that often deliver outsized returns over time. These companies, characterized by their relatively smaller market capitalizations, offer distinct opportunities for substantial growth, portfolio diversification, and potential outperformance driven by market inefficiencies. However, this potential is accompanied by an elevated risk profile, including higher volatility and liquidity challenges. A thorough understanding of their historical performance, risk-reward dynamics, and the critical importance of rigorous due diligence and a long-term investment horizon is essential for investors seeking to harness the transformative potential of these agile enterprises.

 YAINers have already seen examples of such companies with our deep dives in Vidrala and Games Workshop.

Learn AI in 5 minutes a day

This is the easiest way for a busy person wanting to learn AI in as little time as possible:

1. Sign up for The Rundown AI newsletter

2. They send you 5-minute email updates on the latest AI news and how to use it

3. You learn how to become 2x more productive by leveraging AI

Sign up to start learning.

What Are Small-Cap Stocks?

Small-cap stocks typically refer to companies with a market capitalization between $300 million and $2 billion. These businesses are often in the growth phase, may be regionally concentrated, or operate in niche industries. Examples might include innovative tech startups, emerging manufacturers, or local service providers.

The Russell 2000 Index is the most widely recognized benchmark for small-cap stocks in the United States, comprising the smallest 2,000 stocks in the Russell 3000 Index.  STOXX® Europe Small 200 is the European equivalent.

The allure of small-cap stocks lies in their inherent growth potential. These companies are often in the nascent stages of their business development, allowing them considerable room for expansion and rapid revenue acceleration. Investors are frequently drawn to small-caps with the aspiration of identifying the next market leader, aiming to invest in "up-and-coming young companies that are growing fast".

Historical Performance: A Track Record of Growth

Small-cap stocks have historically outperformed their larger counterparts over long investment horizons, albeit with higher volatility. According to data compiled by Ibbotson Associates and Morningstar (leveraging sources like the Ken French data library for periods prior to the Russell 2000's inception in 1984), from 1926 to 2024:

• Small-cap stocks returned an average of 14.3% per year

• Large-cap stocks returned an average of 10.2% per year

As Russell 2000 Index was launched 1 January 1984 we used "U.S. Small Cap" category with data from “Ken French data library” for the period 1926-1983. The logarithmic scale highlights the compounding effect over nearly a century, showing how small-cap stocks (Russell 2000 proxy) can outperform large-caps (S&P 500) over extended periods despite higher volatility. 

Performance Over the Last Decade

However, we see a very different picture for the last decade, the chart below compares the index performance between small-cap and large-cap stocks from 2014 to 2024. Both start with an index base of 100 in 2014.

Why such an underperformance? While there are several reasons, one above all:

Concentration of Gains in Mega-Cap Tech, the S&P 500’s outperformance has been driven disproportionately by a small number of mega-cap technology stocks, often referred to as the "Magnificent 7" (Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA, Amazon, Meta, Alphabet, and Tesla). These seven stocks have had an outsized impact on the S&P 500's performance, particularly in recent years. By the end of 2024, they accounted for over one-third (around 35.4%) of the S&P 500's total market capitalization, up from 12.3% in 2015. From 2015 to 2024, these seven companies achieved a staggering 697.6% return combined, vastly outperforming the S&P 500's 178.3% return over the same period. In 2024, the Magnificent Seven contributed 55% of the S&P 500's total returns and delivered an average total return of 60.5%.

In contrast, the Russell 2000 is equally weighted and lacks exposure to these tech titans.

The Risk and Reward Profile

Advantages of Small-Cap Stocks

1. Higher Growth Potential and Innovation: Small-cap companies, by their very nature, start from a smaller revenue base, which provides them with substantial room for exponential expansion. Unlike their large-cap counterparts, which may already dominate their respective industries and face challenges in sustaining rapid growth, small-caps are often in the nascent stages of their growth cycle, positioning them to significantly expand markets, boost revenues, and build profitability. Their organizational structure typically features less bureaucracy, allowing for greater agility and faster decision-making processes. This nimbleness enables them to innovate rapidly and disrupt established industries, seizing market share before larger, slower-moving competitors can effectively respond. The adoption of cutting-edge technologies, such as artificial intelligence, to enhance operational efficiency is a prime example of how these smaller firms can drive significant growth. 

2. Market Inefficiencies: A significant advantage for investors in small-cap stocks stems from the phenomenon of less analyst coverage. Wall Street analysts predominantly focus their research efforts on large-cap stocks, which attract the majority of institutional investor attention. This reduced scrutiny leaves many small-cap companies underfollowed, creating market inefficiencies where a company's intrinsic value may not be fully reflected in its stock price. For diligent investors willing to conduct in-depth, independent research, this environment presents unique opportunities to discover undervalued assets or "hidden gems" that the broader market has overlooked.

3. M&A Opportunities: Small-cap companies are frequently attractive acquisition targets for larger firms. Larger corporations often seek to expand their product offerings, gain access to new technologies, or enter new markets by acquiring smaller, innovative companies. Such acquisitions can result in significant premiums for the acquired company's shareholders, providing a powerful upside catalyst for investors.

4. Less Direct Global Correlation: While still influenced by broader economic cycles, many small-cap companies operate in specific niche markets or have highly localized revenue streams, which can sometimes provide a degree of independence from global macroeconomic forces that heavily sway multinational large-cap firms. This can lead to idiosyncratic growth driven by unique market opportunities rather than broad market sentiment.

Risks to Consider

1. Volatility and Limited Liquidity Concerns: Small-cap stocks are known for their high volatility, with prices often experiencing sharp and unpredictable swings over short periods. While this volatility can lead to high returns, it also means investors face the risk of significant losses in a short timeframe. Compounding this volatility is their limited liquidity. Small-cap stocks are not traded as frequently as large-cap stocks, which can make it challenging for investors to execute buy or sell orders quickly at their desired prices, particularly during periods of market stress or downturns. Lower trading volume can also lead to wider bid-ask spreads, effectively increasing the cost of transactions. The combined effect of limited liquidity and higher volatility creates a challenging environment during market stress. When trading volume is low, even relatively small sell orders can trigger disproportionately large price drops, making it difficult for investors to exit positions without significant price concessions. This dynamic amplifies the downside risk beyond what fundamental analysis alone might suggest, introducing a substantial market execution risk.

2. Business-Specific Risks: Small-cap companies face several business-specific risks due to their developmental stage and comparatively limited resources. 

   1. They typically possess less access to capital and fewer overall financial resources than large-cap companies.

   2. Many small-cap companies are in nascent stages of development, making them more susceptible to outright failures, financial struggles, or intense competition.

   3. Some small-cap stocks derive a substantial portion of their revenue from a single customer or rely heavily on a limited number of key suppliers. The disruption or loss of such critical relationships can lead to severe financial distress for the company.

   These recurring reasons for small-cap failures, such as flawed business models, insufficient capital, and poor management, underscore that the "high risk" associated with small-cap investing is often rooted in fundamental business execution and viability, not solely market volatility. This emphasizes that rigorous scrutiny of a company's business plan, financial health, and management team is paramount to mitigating downside risk and avoiding potential value traps.

3. Economic Sensitivity & Interest Rate Impacts: Small-cap businesses exhibit high economic sensitivity, meaning their growth and, at times, their survival, are heavily dependent on favorable macroeconomic conditions. They tend to struggle disproportionately during recessions and economic slowdowns compared to their larger, more diversified counterparts, which often possess greater resilience. Rising interest rates can have a particularly adverse impact on small-cap companies. These firms are often more dependent on credit and typically face higher borrowing costs than large-cap firms, with their loans frequently having shorter durations. This increases their debt burden, significantly squeezing their earnings and impeding their growth prospects.

4. Information Asymmetry: A significant challenge for investors in the small-cap space is the lack of readily available public information about these companies. With less analyst coverage, conducting an informed evaluation of small-cap stocks becomes more difficult for potential investors. This information asymmetry means that investors must commit more resources to independent research and due diligence to uncover relevant data and insights that might not be widely disseminated.

Case Studies in Small-Cap Investing

Examining real-world examples of both successful and unsuccessful small-cap journeys provides valuable lessons for prospective investors.

Success Stories: From Small Beginnings to Market Leaders

Several companies have demonstrated remarkable growth, transitioning from small-cap status to become significant players in their respective industries.

• Monster Beverage — $MNST ( ▲ 0.57% ): In the early 2000s, Monster Beverage began as a relatively small market participant. Through strategic distribution expansion, aggressive brand building, and effectively capturing market share within the burgeoning energy drink industry, it transformed into a dominant force. The company's share price increased by an impressive 83% over a five-year period, supported by consistent earnings per share (EPS) growth averaging 8.7% annually. This performance reflected improving market sentiment and successful execution of its growth strategy.

• Shopify — $SHOP ( ▲ 4.04% ): Shopify's ascent is a testament to building a scalable software platform that empowers small businesses to establish and manage online stores. The company achieved rapid revenue increases with minimal scaling costs, creating significant value for shareholders. Its continued growth is driven by enhanced conversion visibility, data derived from payment processing transitions, and increasing adoption of its integrated payment solution, Shop Pay. Recent innovations, including AI-driven features like the AI Store Builder, further contribute to its expansion. The stock experienced a nearly 66% increase over the past year, underpinned by robust revenue growth of 26.5%.

• The Trade Desk — $TTD ( ▲ 4.31% ): Launched as a small entity in 2016, The Trade Desk successfully capitalized on the rapidly growing digital advertising industry. It achieved high revenue growth rates by expertly leveraging the industry's shift towards programmatic advertising. Its Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) saw a substantial increase to 15% over five years, significantly surpassing the industry average. This indicates a highly profitable reinvestment of capital within the business, driving long-term value creation.

These success stories often share common patterns: a strong product-market fit, effective scaling strategies, adaptability to emerging trends (such as digital transformation and artificial intelligence), and frequently, visionary and competent leadership. The consistent patterns in these successful small-cap growth stories imply that qualitative due diligence is as crucial as quantitative analysis. Identifying these underlying strengths in a small company's operations and leadership can serve as a strong predictor of future success, helping to differentiate potential "multi-baggers" from purely speculative ventures.

Lessons from Challenges and Failures: Common Pitfalls in Small-Cap Investing

Conversely, numerous small-cap ventures encounter significant challenges or ultimately fail, offering critical lessons on the pitfalls to avoid.

• Pets.com (Dot-Com Bubble Era): Pets.com serves as a prominent cautionary tale from the dot-com bubble. Despite raising $82.5 million in its February 2000 initial public offering (IPO), the company filed for bankruptcy just nine months later. The primary reason for its failure was a fundamentally flawed business model, which included significant logistical challenges in economically shipping bulky pet supplies and intense competition from established physical retailers. The company failed to adequately validate market demand for its online-only model at the time. This case exemplifies the dangers of investing in businesses with "back-of-the-napkin" plans that lack fundamental viability.

• LexaGene Holdings (Biotech Funding Failure): LexaGene Holdings serves as a stark example of the inherent risks in investing in early-stage, capital-intensive biotech companies. Operating as a small-cap entity, the company was focused on developing advanced pathogen detection systems, a promising technology still in its pre-revenue phase and heavily reliant on external investment. The company was ultimately forced to file for bankruptcy in February 2023. The primary reason for its failure was an unsustainable funding model, where the substantial and ongoing capital requirements for research, development, and eventual commercialization far outpaced its ability to secure successive rounds of financing. This case exemplifies the dangers of investing in innovative ventures that, despite technological promise, lack the financial resilience or consistent access to capital necessary to navigate long and expensive development cycles.

• MoviePass (Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc.) (Unsustainable Business Model): MoviePass, primarily operating through its parent company Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. (NASDAQ: HMNY), became a sensational yet ultimately disastrous small-cap story. After a dramatic price drop in 2017 to an unsustainable $9.95 per month for unlimited movie tickets, the subscription service experienced a massive surge in popularity, quickly accumulating millions of subscribers. However, despite this rapid user growth, the company filed for bankruptcy for its MoviePass subsidiary in January 2020, with its parent company delisting earlier. The primary reason for its failure was a fundamentally flawed economic model, as the company paid full price for movie tickets but sold them to subscribers at a significant loss. This led to an astronomical cash burn rate that was impossible to sustain, coupled with an inability to negotiate favorable revenue-sharing agreements with movie theaters. This case exemplifies the dangers of investing in companies with aggressive growth strategies built on economically unviable foundations, where rapid customer acquisition directly translates into rapid financial depletion.

Broader analysis of small business failures reveals recurring themes highly relevant to assessing small-cap stock risks:

• Lack of Market Research and Understanding: Entrepreneurs often overestimate or underestimate market demand, leading to inefficient inventory management, overproduction, or missed sales opportunities.

• Insufficient Capital and Financial Mismanagement: Inadequate funding for essential operational expenses, an inability to seize growth opportunities, poor cash flow management, and potential non-compliance with legal and regulatory requirements are common issues.

• Ineffective Business Planning and Strategy: The absence of a clear roadmap, inaccurate financial forecasting, or a failure to adequately analyze competitors can derail a small company's trajectory.

• Poor Management and Leadership: A lack of business acumen, disengaged employees, resistance to necessary change, and a failure to innovate can severely cripple a small business.

• External Factors Beyond Control: While not always the sole cause, macroeconomic shocks, such as severe economic downturns, can disproportionately impact small, less resilient businesses, pushing them towards failure even if their internal operations are relatively sound.

The consistent patterns in these small-cap failures, such as flawed business models, insufficient capital, and poor management, underscore that the "high risk" of small-cap investing is often rooted in fundamental business execution and viability, rather than solely market volatility. This highlights that rigorous scrutiny of a company's core business plan, financial health, and the competence of its management team is paramount to mitigating downside risk and avoiding investments in companies with inherent structural weaknesses.

Who are the ideal Investors for Small-Cap Stocks?

Investing in small-cap stocks isn't for everyone. It requires:

• Long-term patience to ride out volatility

• Risk tolerance to accept potential short-term losses

• Diligence in research and stock selection

They are particularly suited for:

• Young investors with time on their side

• Growth-oriented portfolios

• Investors seeking diversification beyond blue chips

Small-cap stocks represent a compelling avenue for investors looking for high growth potential. While the journey may be bumpier, the long-term rewards can be substantial. By understanding the risks, employing smart diversification strategies, and staying committed for the long haul, investors can harness the power of small caps to supercharge their portfolios.